Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Wolfy Jack's avatar

I don't expect Elon Musk, likely the most disliked person in the US, being the person to catalyze a new party.

I can understand Jay's thoughts on a new political party, given that traditional conservatives have been wandering in the desert for some time, but I don't think the formula for such party is resurrecting traditional Reagan Republicans. We already have Libertarians who advocate most of what Jay speaks to - "... rule of law. Constitutionalism. Individual rights. Limited government. Free enterprise. Federalism. Civil society. National security. Fiscal responsibility. Personal responsibility"

My concept is the sane center of American politics. Studies show that there is majority support for Democrats on healthcare, environment, modest social safety net and Republicans on crime, secure border. Also majorities support reduction in debt and support for Ukraine. That is where I think a party could emerge, not just having another party on the right anymore than a further left party would succeed. The Libertarians and Greens have little to show.

So as a devotee of Saint Jude, the patron saint of lost causes, I have a new Quixotic venture I am calling the Democratic Republican party. Yes, the once party of Jefferson, Madison, and Monroe that disbanded in 1825 and split into the Democrats and Whigs. I have started a Facebook group which like my others are likely to go nowhere but check it out https://www.facebook.com/groups/1977756669701653

But Reagan Republicans I think need to work with conservative Bill Clinton Democrats like myself and notice the Chesterton Fence that a modest safety net with healthcare, environmental actions to preserve our planet, is what we have and what people want, just as they want secure borders, strong public safety, and no racial preferences.

I see an alliance as being between supporters of John Kasich and Bill Clinton, the compassionate conservatives and unwoke modest social Democrats.. The endless debate over amount of government and social welfare, and regulation vs laissez faire can continue but needs to be done in the spirit of compromise not in ideological purity. We all agree that rule of law and the Constitution and support for democracy trumps all these arguments.

Expand full comment
Jim L's avatar

From the Column:

You know the kind of party I would welcome? I will take a crack at sketching it out:

A party that stands for the rule of law. Constitutionalism. Individual rights. Limited government. Free enterprise. Federalism. Civil society. National security. Fiscal responsibility. Personal responsibility, too. Character in office. E pluribus unum. Western civilization (with its flavoring by cultures everywhere).

That checks a lot of boxes. Name the party and sign me up.

Expand full comment
10 more comments...

No posts